Skip navigation.

Toxics Reports

All Toxics Reports

Guide to Greener Electronics 13th edition

September 30, 2009


The Greener Electronics Guide is our way of getting the electronics industry to take responsibility for the entire lifecycle of its products. We want it to face up to the problem of e-waste and take on the challenge of tackling climate change. Check how 18 market leaders in the electronics industry measure up.

Download PDF (1 Mb)

2009 Chemical Security Lobby Report

September 11, 2009

The American Chemistry Council and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Led 2008 Campaign to Kill Chemical Security Legislation

Download PDF (1 Mb)

A History of Legislation on Chemical Security

July 20, 2009

This timeline documents the failure of the government to take actions to protect the country from toxic chemicals.

Last updated on October 27, 2009.

Download PDF (41 Kb)

Guide to Greener Electronics - 12

July 01, 2009

The 12th edition of Greenpeace's "Guide to Greener Electronics" ranking reveals that the world's biggest PC makers – Hewlett Packard (HP), Dell and Lenovo have failed to improve their low scores. All three maintain a penalty point for backtracking on their commitments to eliminate polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from their products by the end of 2009.

Download PDF (1 Mb)

Chemical Security Testimony by Greenpeace's Rick Hind

June 30, 2009

Chemical Security - A Rising Concern for America: Examination of the Department's Chemical Security Regulations and its Effect on the Public and Private Sector.

Download PDF (126 Kb)

Guide to Greener Electronics - March 2009

March 31, 2009


The Greener Electronics Guide is our way of getting the electronics industry to take responsibility for the entire life cycle of its products. We want it to face up to the problem of e-waste and take on the challenge of tackling climate change. Check how 18 market leaders in the electronics industry measure up.

Download PDF (954 Kb)

Green Electronics: the search continues...

January 08, 2009

The results of the Green Electronics Survey 2008.

Download PDF (667 Kb)

Greener Electronics Apple Ranking - 9th Edition

September 16, 2008

Apple’s score remains the same, at 4.1 points, but the company drops to 13th position. Apple scores well for putting products on the market whose key components are free of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and PVC vinyl plastic. Apple’s latest iPods - the iPod Touch, iPod Nano and iPod Classic, are now free of both PVC and BFRs, along with an absence of mercury and the use of arsenic-free glass.

Many other models have PVC and BFR free components; for example, all new models of iMac and the MacBook Air. While Apple has now positioned itself amongst the leaders in the electronics industry on phasing out toxic substances, to score more points the complete phase-out of PVC and BFRs in its iPods should be consistent across all other future product ranges, from Apple iPhone to Apple Macs. Apple also needs to commit to phasing out additional substances with timelines, improve its policy on chemicals and its reporting on chemicals management.

Apple scores poorly on most e-waste criteria, except for reporting a recycling rate in 2006 of 9.5% as a percentage of sales 7 years ago.

It does only slightly better on energy criteria, failing to score on all criteria except energy efficiency of products, where it scores top marks (doubled) for all desktops computers, portable PCs and displays complying with Energy Star 4.0 and their iPod and iPhone power adapters not only exceeding the Energy Star standard, but already meeting California’s stricter efficiency regulations that became effective 1 July 2008.

Download PDF (488 Kb)

Guide to Greener Electronics - 9th Edition

September 16, 2008

Welcome to the 9th edition of the Guide to Greener Electronics. Greenpeace scores electronics brands on a tightened set of chemicals and e-waste criteria, (which include new criteria) and on new energy criteria.

The ranking criteria reflect the demands of the Toxic Tech campaign to electronics companies. Our two demands are that companies should: (1) clean up their products by eliminating hazardous substances; and (2) take-back and recycle their products responsibly once they become obsolete.

The two issues are connected: the use of harmful chemicals in electronic products prevents their safe recycling once the products are discarded. Given the increasing evidence of climate change and the urgency of addressing this issue, Greenpeace has added new energy criteria to encourage electronics companies to: (3) improve their corporate policies and practices with respect to Climate and Energy.

Download PDF (1 Mb)

Greenpeace Urges Action to Eliminate Risks at Chemical Plants Near National Conventions in a letter to the U.S. Secret Service

July 25, 2008

As preparations for the Democratic and Republican conventions in Denver, CO and St. Paul, MN draw to a close, Greenpeace issued a warning to federal and local agencies about the toxic hazards posed to the millions of residents surrounding these conventions as well as those attending them. According to facility reports to the EPA, chemical plants in each city threaten more than a million residents as do rail shipments supplying these chemicals to these facilities.

In a letter to the Secret Service, Greenpeace called for three immediate steps: re-routing of rail cars carrying poison gas, testing security at local chemical plants with “red-team” exercises and beginning the conversion of these plants to safer chemicals or processes to permanently eliminate these risks as other cities have already done.

Download PDF (49 Kb)
Previous Page -
Learn more
Global warming
Oceans
Forests
Nuclear
Toxics
Staff blog
Media center
Press contacts
News releases
Bloggers Center
Experts
Photos
Videos
Get involved
Take action
Jobs
Greenpeace Organizing Term
Greenpeace Student Network
Donate
Renew your membership

Greenpeace Fund
Make a tax-deductible donation
Gift and estate planning

702 H Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 462-1177